SouthSudan.Net

What kind of message Malaak Ayuen wanted to convey to public through SSTV
ARM PROGRAMME?

It so good to have South Sudan arm force program that raise the moral of our
people, but what is the purpose of that program of the very armed force of
Malaak? What kind of message really Mr Malaak wanted to convey to public?
Does Mr Malaak personally the owner of the program in order to downgraded
other ethnic group of South Sudan throughout the time, and in SSTV program
Mr Malaak attempted seriously to promote tribalism and favoritism on account
of others in the South? Is that SSTV Malaak arm force's Program a political
or is it a military program?

If you think keenly on those ideas aired as patriotically and justly as on
what message being spread out there by that respected person, it is very
shameful to me to continue steering public emotion terribly on national
TV.Why on earth a man worked tirelessly to divide the nation, cemented
hateful information in people's life in South Sudan. For me I think Malaak
has got his own hidden agenda contrary of what of this Government and the
people of this nation I honestly appreciate the patriot Mr Nhial Bol the man
is gentle and wise enough to reflect the truth. I have read a lot of his
patriotic messages delivered by him through the column straight talk, to me
they were constructive and corrective.

Last week Malaak was talking on struggle of people of greater Bar El Gazal
region and their role on what we people had achieved on 9/July/2011 which
I'm proud for, but I don't see any single reason why Malaak lost his topic
went astray, and began to talk of Dinka Bar Elgazal of being fought Nuer
cattle raiders, Bagara and Paulino Matip militias if this could be true of
struggle of that great region then where was that struggle of people of Bar
El Gazal? What was the benefits of Nuer cattle raiders and Paulino Matip
Militias in that point? Do they struggle against Nuer? The lesson I learned
of arm force program of Malaak on SSTV IS (1) Dinka were only strong people
who brought independent. (2) other people of South Sudan were not part of
struggle (3) John Garang was best leader was not born and shall not be born
on earth.  (4) no patriots except SPLM members.

One of the examples of Malak messages he said Toposa people were bought with
biscuits and Tania to me this is not necessary, there are many example
Malaak jump into politic or best call it tribalism which has nothing to do
with Military like the way he talk of Vice President on what so-called
apology.what is a relationship between arm force program and the apology of
which Malaak jump into intolerantly? The so-called Riek Machar Apology to
Dinka Bor and to many SPLM/SPLA MEMBERS  AND OTHER SELFISH COMMUNITIES think
that 1991 was wrong but to people of South Sudan it was corrective and
roadmap for our independent.  So in terms of massacre of Gajak and the Lou
Nuer were considered as expenses or costs of revolution as always quoted by
SPLM MEMBERS but the different is that SPLM MEMBERs differentiated it
interestingly when it turn out to be Bor communities and 1991, now people
always began to talk of massacre, it become massacre when it turn out to be
Bor and the 1991 split. why it  is not painful when it come to matter of
Gajaak,  Lou Nuer and Gawaar communities in 1985s ,some argued when it comes
to killing of leaders' Keribino Kuanyin has been killed by Peter Gadet some
said, and nobody care to say anything when it comes in matter of fact that
John Garang had sent him to do so because of the struggle, Garang is holy
when he killed Samuel Gai and Lokurnyang because of the struggle for unity
of Sudan, Abel Alier is also holy and cannot be bought with money whenever
hijacked and sent by Arab to take responsibility from Joseph Lagu to
implement the agenda of Arabs although he didn't go to bush,but when it
comes to Riek Gai and Riek Machar they were bought with money some infant
journalists whose motive tribally motivated convey message like talking to
kids being not aware to who to communicate and the outcome in turn of what
they wrote and said to people through means of media .  if Malak could be
the only journalist in South Sudan his program should force non journalist
to write and to defence the nation from poison of viability and tribalists
like him. the Government of the Republic of South Sudan must stop Malaak
from airing divisive message and stop him work on this program because he
fail to do that job.

The SPLA army has put in jail Mr David Biel Jal the General Secretary of
UDSF who has a good reason to talk of politic then Malaak Ayuen because he
have just said in AL jezera news that the new cabinet were old faces now the
army detained and jailed him for reason of being arm officer from SPLA why
not Malaak Ayuen who talk of politic and criticized part of his Government
politically like a vice President. Malaak has no other things to talk of,
except what he think was wrong of Nasir Faction.

The man is wicked enough to poison the Country of his illusion, he still
held in mind the propaganda campaign information launched in 1980s by Late
Dr John on separatists so-called Nyagad/Bergad or Bourgeoisie as adopted
from Marxists speculation. That campaign will never unite this people of
South Sudan because could not focus on the past although there are a lot of
challenges in matter of nation building.

If I could talk a bid of what happened in South Sudan there were two
theories of looking at the solution of the problem of South Sudan by South
Sudanese politicians meanwhile Arabs also has only one way of solving
problem of Sudan, that is to unite Sudan under Islamic Rule. While South
Sudanese look at as followed (1) there were those who think they could solve
the problem of South by forcing secular system and the rule of law upon
Muslim North Sudan, those leaders or politicians were William Deng Nhial,
John Garang and More those politicians if not all of them fought, murdered
more or died of that cause blamed and blaming others who did not join them
on their way even killed communities or some other leaders like them they
had a reason of doing so, if you ask them they can tell you they doing that
for struggle for the  nation, their followers said the same and call them
patriot and heroes. (2) there were those who look at the resolution in angle
of separation those leaders or politicians were Both Diu, Joseph Lagu ,
Samuel Gai, Riek Machar, Chuol Deng, Lam Akol and more those leaders also
had their cause of action  to fight for and commited killing  because of the
very cause, the question is who were right among them and who to blame?  To
me we all South Sudanese those politicians has been looking at problem in
different angles they been doing that of attempting to solve the issue of
the South Sudan as well as Sudan problem they were all patriot, we have to
thank Chuol Deang and Kirobino Kuanyin Bol which were murdered by Garang
because he had been fighting for separate as well as Gai Tut and Akot Atem
since we South Sudanese agreed with them in their way to stop those who have
just wanted to talk for the sake of division of our people I don't think
glorifying one person by force should even destroy his legacy in the long
run specially DR John Garang he is our Leader like any Leader of South
Sudan. many people telling lie of him attempting to covered any wrong he has
done like atrocities and massacres a long side to killing of leaders if
Rebbeca THE WIDOW OF LATE Dr John mean real reconciliation process she can
even continue to apology and ask for forgiveness to Gajaak, Lou Nuer
communities and the families of Leaders murdered by her husband in fact Bor
Community needed to be very careful on steering up issues other communities
kept silence and quiet for the sake of this nation as for the fact mentioned
by President, that we need to go forward and forgot the past.

Iam surprise of those elements whose motives and likes are to destroy public
interests by wanted it for themselves, forgetting that no interest in Adam
Island, what will you gain if other nationals of South Sudan could not
exist. How can we have this Country Independent. It is better to me to be
proud for all South Sudanese Nationals, war has nothing good many people
knows including Malaak himself. Our  people has a history of unity behind
Anyanya one, Anyanya two and the SPLA we were able to support ourselves as
people and Movements in terms of food for Soldiers although we were differed
in ideologies and belief on ways of solving the problem of Sudan.

It took many South Sudanese to endure the what so-call Malaak's program on
SSTV this program is controversial, it is tribally-steering and
problem-creating. Mr Malaak confused the public and created division instead
of attracting people of the Republic to be loyal to our arm force I think it
is not good to convey to the public that Toposa people of Eastern Equatoria
were weak people who always bought by Arabs with biscuits and Tania or
bribed for food, further mentioned that 80% of SPLA were from Dinka tribe
trying to convince the listeners and the children that those who were in
struggle was Dinka only or denied the fact of national participation on
struggle of which took our fathers, mothers, brothers and sisters so many
years until victorious votes on referendum. What kind of message Malaak
Ayueen wanted to convey to the public on SSTV arm force program?